News
The Lawyers’ Society expresses its profound dismay regarding the decision made by Parliament on the 20th day of December 2024 to endorse the recommendation of the tribunal that investigated Madam Lara Taylor-Pearce, the Auditor General, and her deputy, Mr. Tamba Momoh. This decision has been met with serious concerns about the integrity of the parliamentary process and the adherence to constitutional mandates.
We are seriously concerned about allegations of procedural irregularities that have marred this process. Reports indicate that members of Parliament were not given adequate notice prior to the consideration and voting on this critical matter. Furthermore, it has come to our attention that several members were out of the jurisdiction attending to official duties at the time of the vote. Such actions suggest a troubling disregard for the constitutional significance of this issue and may reflect a deliberate attempt to circumvent due process.
According to the combined effect of Sections 119(9) and 137(7) of the Constitution, the removal of the Auditor General requires a two-thirds majority of the total membership of Parliament, not merely those present at the time of the vote. We respectfully disagree with the interpretation reportedly provided by the Honourable Speaker, which he imposed during the process that the two-thirds requirement applies only to those in attendance. This interpretation undermines the procedural integrity of the decision-making process and raises further questions about the legitimacy of the vote.
Parliament has a sacred duty to uphold fairness and justice in its proceedings. The apparent haste to remove the Auditor General, without ensuring the necessary procedural propriety, is deeply concerning. The Society is particularly troubled by the implications of this decision for the independence of offices designed to check executive power. If the Auditor General, who enjoys protections akin to judges of the Superior Court of Judicature, can be removed under such questionable circumstances, we fear for the future independence of our judiciary.
We call on Parliament to reconsider this decision and to adhere strictly to its own established procedures as the custodian of the constitutional framework of Sierra Leone. We urge the people of Sierra Leone and civil societies to hold their representatives accountable and demand transparency in this matter. Additionally, we appeal to the international community to align their policies and programmes that foster good governance and safeguard institutions that serve to check governmental excesses.
The Lawyers’ Society remains committed to advocating for justice, fairness, and the rule of law in Sierra Leone. We will continue to monitor this situation closely and take necessary actions to uphold the integrity of our democratic institutions.
End of Statement